Matter of Akhtab v Kenney

Annotate this Case
Matter of Akhtab v Kenney 2013 NY Slip Op 00272 Decided on January 17, 2013 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on January 17, 2013
Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, DeGrasse, Richter, Clark, JJ.
9032 106770/11 -5635] -5746

[*1]In re Mageedah Akhtab, Petitioner, -- Hon.

v

Joan M. Kenney, etc., et al., Respondents.




Mageedah Akhtab, petitioner pro se.
Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Garrett
Coyle of counsel), for Hon. Joan M. Kenney, respondent.

The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules,

And a cross motion having been made on behalf of respondent Hon. Joan M. Kenney to dismiss the petition,

Now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon,

It is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied, the cross motion granted and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

ENTERED: JANUARY 17, 2013

CLERK

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.