Matter of Government Empls. Ins. Co. v Martin

Annotate this Case
Matter of Government Empls. Ins. Co. v Martin 2013 NY Slip Op 00271 Decided on January 17, 2013 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on January 17, 2013
Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, DeGrasse, Clark, JJ.


[*1]9031In re Government Employees 260311/11 Insurance Company, etc., Petitioner-Respondent,

v

Dawn Martin, Respondent, HF Management Services, LLC, et al., Proposed Additional Respondents-Appellants.




Law Offices of Stewart H. Friedman, Garden City (Robert F.
Horvat of counsel), for appellants.
Monfort Healy McGuire & Salley, Garden City (Donald S.
Neumann, Jr., of counsel), for Government Employees
Insurance Company, respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mary Ann Brigantti-Hughes, J.), entered December 1, 2011, which, after a framed-issue hearing in this proceeding pursuant to CPLR 7503(b) to permanently stay arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim, granted the petition and permanently stayed the arbitration, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Petitioner established by admissible proof that a vehicle owned and insured respectively by appellants was involved in the alleged accident. At the hearing, no objection was made to the admission of the police report containing the license plate number of the vehicle. Accordingly, the evidence is presumed to have been unobjectionable and any error is considered waived (CPLR 4017; Komsa v Colonial Penn Ins. Co., 188 AD2d 367, 367 [1st Dept 1992]). In any event, the contents of the police report were admissible under the present sense exception to the hearsay rule, as they were sufficiently corroborated by respondent's testimony (see Jara v Salinas-Ramirez, 65 AD3d 933 [1st Dept 2009]; People v Brown, 80 NY2d 729 [1993]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: JANUARY 17, 2013

CLERK

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.