People v Rudge

Annotate this Case
People v Rudge 2013 NY Slip Op 08013 Decided on December 3, 2013 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 3, 2013
Tom, J.P., Saxe, DeGrasse, Richter, Clark, JJ.
11213

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Dkt. 10018C/11 Respondent,

v

Frank Rudge, also known as Frank Ridge, Defendant-Appellant.




Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Laura Boyd
of counsel), for appellant.
Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, Bronx (Bari L. Kamlet of
counsel), for respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Harold Adler, J.), rendered March 21, 2011, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of menacing in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of four months, unanimously affirmed.

Since defendant never moved to withdraw his guilty plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction, his challenge to the voluntariness of his plea is unpreserved, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice (see People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 666 [1988]). The narrow exception to the preservation rule is not applicable because nothing in the plea allocution casts doubt on defendant's guilt (see id.). In any event, nothing in the record shows the plea was not voluntarily made or that defendant did not understand the consequences of the plea.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: DECEMBER 3, 2013

CLERK

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.