Matter of Abu I. v Zaratu I.
Annotate this CaseDecided on November 7, 2013
Mazzarelli, J.P., Acosta, Saxe, Richter, Feinman, JJ. 10982-
10982A
[*1]In re Abu I., Petitioner-Appellant,
v
Zaratu I., Respondent-Respondent.
Andrew J. Baer, New York, for appellant.
Orders, Family Court, Bronx County (David B. Cohen, J.), entered on or about November 30, 2012, which, after a fact-finding hearing, respectively, dismissed with prejudice the petition alleging family offenses against respondent, and ordered a full order of protection against petitioner, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
A fair preponderance of the evidence supports the court's finding that petitioner committed acts that would constitute assault in the third degree, menacing in the second and third degrees, and criminal obstruction of breathing or blood circulation (see Family Court Act §§ 812; 832). The court's
credibility determinations are supported by the record and therefore entitled to deference (see Matter of Creighton v Whitmore, 71 AD3d 1141 [2d Dept 2010]).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: NOVEMBER 7, 2013
CLERK
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.