Matter of James P.

Annotate this Case
Matter of James P. 2013 NY Slip Op 06318 Decided on October 1, 2013 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on October 1, 2013
Andrias, J.P., Sweeny, Acosta, Saxe, Clark, JJ.
10645

[*1]In re James P., etc., A Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

Presentment Agency


Tamara A. Steckler, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Patricia
Colella of counsel), for appellant.
Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Diana
Lawless of counsel), for presentment agency.

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Mary E. Bednar, J.), entered on or about January 10, 2012, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon a fact-finding determination that he had committed an act that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of attempted assault in the third degree, and imposed a conditional discharge for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly exercised its discretion in adjudicating appellant a juvenile delinquent and imposing a conditional discharge. The court adopted the least restrictive dispositional alternative consistent with appellant's needs and the community's need for protection (see Matter of Katherine W., 62 NY2d 947 [1984]). Positive factors in appellant's background were outweighed by the violent nature of the underlying incident, by appellant's lack of remorse or acceptance of responsibility for his conduct, and by appellant's acknowledged history of anger management issues for which he had received counseling (see e.g. Matter of Shariah T., 107 AD3d 605 [1st Dept 2013]; Matter of Mia R., 102 AD3d 627 [1st Dept 2013]; compare Matter of Tyttus D., 107 AD3d 404 [1st Dept 2013]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: OCTOBER 1, 2013

CLERK

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.