Matter of Ojuola v New York State Div. of Human Rights

Matter of Matter of Ojuola v New York State Div. of Human Rights 2012 NY Slip Op 04074 Decided on May 24, 2012 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on May 24, 2012
Gonzalez, P.J., Andrias, Saxe, DeGrasse, Román, JJ.
7749 260384/09

[*1]In re Theophilus Y. Ojuola, Petitioner-Appellant,

v

New York State Division of Human Rights, Respondent-Respondent.




Theophilus Y. Ojuola, appellant pro se.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alison Y. Tuitt, J.), entered November 1, 2011, which, to the extent appealable, denied petitioner's motion to renew his article 78 petition challenging a determination by the New York State Division of Human Rights, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The IAS court properly denied the motion to renew, as petitioner submitted no new facts in support of his petition (William P. Pahl Equip. Corp. v Kassis, 182 AD2d 22, 27 [1992], lv denied in part, dismissed in part 80 NY2d 1005 [1992]; Foley v Roche, 68 AD2d 558, 568 [1979]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: MAY 24, 2012

CLERK