People v Bradley
Annotate this Case
People v Bradley
2011 NY Slip Op 08493
Decided on November 22, 2011
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on November 22, 2011
Moskowitz, J.P., Renwick, DeGrasse, Abdus-Salaam, Román, JJ.
6143 3149/04 6143A 6165/04
[*1]The People of the State of New York, Ind. Respondent,SCI.
v
Zhaundu Bradley, Defendant-Appellant.
Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York
(Mark W. Zeno of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Alan Gadlin
of counsel), for respondent.
Decided on November 22, 2011
Moskowitz, J.P., Renwick, DeGrasse, Abdus-Salaam, Román, JJ.
6143 3149/04 6143A 6165/04
[*1]The People of the State of New York, Ind. Respondent,SCI.
v
Zhaundu Bradley, Defendant-Appellant.
Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York
(Mark W. Zeno of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Alan Gadlin
of counsel), for respondent.
Judgments of resentence, Supreme Court, New York County (Daniel P. FitzGerald, J.), rendered November 3, 2010, resentencing defendant to an aggregate term of 8 years, with 2½ years' postrelease supervision, unanimously affirmed.
The resentencing proceeding imposing a term of postrelease supervision was neither barred by double jeopardy nor otherwise unlawful (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: NOVEMBER 22, 2011
CLERK
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
