Matter of Jones v Conviser

Annotate this Case
Matter of Jones v Conviser 2011 NY Slip Op 05880 Decided on July 7, 2011 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on July 7, 2011
Mazzarelli, J.P., Catterson, DeGrasse, Abdus-Salaam, Román, JJ.
5538 50377/08 -2545

[*1]In re Robert Jones, Petitioner, -- Justice

v

Daniel Conviser, et al., Respondents.



 
Douglas G. Rankin, Brooklyn, for petitioner.
Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Roberta L.
Martin of counsel), for Hon. Daniel Conviser, respondent.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Rachel
Ehrhardt of counsel), for Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., respondent.

The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules,

Now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon,

It is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

ENTERED: JULY 7, 2011

CLERK

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.