People v Pozo

Annotate this Case
People v Pozo 2011 NY Slip Op 01694 Decided on March 8, 2011 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on March 8, 2011
Tom, J.P., Sweeny, Renwick, Freedman, Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
4442 4618/04

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Kevin Pozo, Defendant-Appellant.




Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Joanne
Legano Ross of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Sheryl
Feldman of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles J. Tejada, J.), entered on or about November 19, 2008, which adjudicated defendant a level two sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court had ample evidence on which to assess 15 points under the risk factor for drug or alcohol abuse. In any event, even without that assessment defendant would remain a level two offender, and we find no basis for a discretionary downward departure from his presumptive risk level (see People v Mingo, 12 NY3d 563, 568 n 2 [2009]; People v Johnson, 11 NY3d 416, 421 2008]). The mitigating circumstances cited by defendant were adequately taken into account by the risk assessment instrument.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: MARCH 8, 2011

CLERK

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.