Makkos v Makkos

Annotate this Case
Makkos v Makkos 2010 NY Slip Op 02428 [71 AD3d 563] March 23, 2010 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, April 28, 2010

Liana Makkos, Respondent,
v
Thomas Makkos, Appellant.

—[*1] Clair, Greifer LLP, New York (Bernard E. Clair of counsel), for appellant.

Gersten Savage LLP, New York (Robert S. Wolf of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jacqueline W. Silbermann, J.), entered September 29, 2008, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, found defendant had not met his stipulated obligation to pay plaintiff $250,000, and directed him to pay that sum within 30 days, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The parties clearly and unambiguously agreed that defendant would pay $250,000 directly to plaintiff over a period of three years following the execution of their stipulation in 2003. It is undisputed that defendant failed to make these payments. He contends that plaintiff should be equitably estopped from raising that failure because he made voluntary payments to third parties during that period. The court correctly rejected that argument without holding an evidentiary hearing. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Friedman, DeGrasse, Abdus-Salaam and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.