CSSEL Bare Trust v Phoenix Life Ins. Co.

Annotate this Case
CSSEL Bare Trust v Phoenix Life Ins. Co. 2009 NY Slip Op 07321 [66 AD3d 495] October 13, 2009 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, December 9, 2009

CSSEL Bare Trust, Dated as of April 21, 2006, Appellant,
v
Phoenix Life Insurance Company, Respondent.

—[*1] O'Melveny & Myers, LLP, New York (Kenneth T. Murata of counsel), for appellant.

Dorsey & Whitney LLP, New York (Patrick J. Feeley of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marcy S. Friedman, J.), entered March 17, 2009, which granted defendant's motion to dismiss or stay the action to the extent of staying the action pending determination in a federal action entitled Kramer v Lockwood Pension Servs., Inc. (US Dist Ct, SD NY, 08 CV 2429, Batts, J., 2008) of defendant's sixth defense of no insurable interest, unanimously dismissed as moot, without costs.

Inasmuch as the District Court issued its decision in the federal action on September 1, 2009 (653 F Supp 2d 354 [SD NY 2009]), the issue raised on this appeal, whether the motion court abused its discretion in granting a discretionary stay (CPLR 2201), has been rendered moot. Concur—Saxe, J.P., Nardelli, Buckley, Acosta and Freedman, JJ. [See 2009 NY Slip Op 30569(U).]

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.