Polygram Holding, Inc. v Cafaro

Annotate this Case
Polygram Holding, Inc. v Cafaro 2009 NY Slip Op 07165 [66 AD3d 431] October 6, 2009 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, December 9, 2009

Polygram Holding, Inc., Respondent,
v
Al Cafaro, Appellant.

—[*1] Lawrence W. Rader, New York (David Samel of counsel), for appellant.

Jenner & Block LLP, New York (Andrew H. Bart of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen Bransten, J.), entered April 29, 2009, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, limited the scope of an examination before trial granted to defendant and denied defendant's motion to strike the note of issue, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court appropriately struck a discretionary balance in granting defendant certain additional discovery consistent with our prior discovery ruling in this matter (42 AD3d 339, 340-341 [2007]), while maintaining control of its trial calendar (Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v American Home Assur. Co., 23 AD3d 190 [2005]).

We have examined the balance of defendant's argument and find it unavailing. Concur—Saxe, J.P., Sweeny, Acosta and Richter, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.