People v Sanchez

Annotate this Case
People v Sanchez 2009 NY Slip Op 07152 [66 AD3d 420] October 6, 2009 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, December 9, 2009

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Nelson Sanchez, Appellant.

—[*1] Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Robert S. Dean of counsel), for appellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (John B.F. Martin of counsel), for respondent.

Judgments, Supreme Court, New York County (Daniel P. FitzGerald, J.), rendered October 17, 2007, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the second degree, and also convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of a robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of four years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant's suppression motion. The showup identification made about 15 minutes after the crime within a few blocks of the crime scene was not unduly suggestive (see People v Duuvon, 77 NY2d 541 [1991]). The presence of three or four officers alongside the three unhandcuffed suspects was a justified security measure, and even if the victim heard a radio transmission stating that suspects fitting the description he had given had been stopped, a person of ordinary intelligence would have drawn that inference from the circumstances in any event (see People v Gatling, 38 AD3d 239, 240 [2007], lv denied 9 NY3d 865 [2007]).

We perceive no basis for granting defendant youthful offender treatment. Concur—Saxe, J.P., Sweeny, Moskowitz, Acosta and Richter, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.