Coastal Sheet Metal Corp. v Martin Assoc., Inc.

Annotate this Case
Coastal Sheet Metal Corp. v Martin Assoc., Inc. 2009 NY Slip Op 05270 [63 AD3d 617] June 25, 2009 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, August 5, 2009

Coastal Sheet Metal Corp., Appellant,
v
Martin Associates, Inc., Respondent, et al., Defendants.

—[*1] Sullivan Gardner P.C., New York (Brian Gardner of counsel), for appellant.

Vincent J. Torna, New York, for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Betty Owen Stinson, J.), entered December 27, 2007, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff's last remaining cause of action for breach of contract, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion denied and the complaint reinstated.

The court erred in finding that, contrary to its claim of underpayment on a total of 13 jobs, plaintiff had in fact been overpaid, based on its review of change orders in only 10 of those jobs. The grant of summary judgment to defendant was error inasmuch as the documentation it provided failed to demonstrate that it had made full payment to plaintiff and that no issues of fact remained. Defendant "cannot obtain summary judgment by pointing to gaps in plaintiff['s] proof" (Torres v Industrial Container, 305 AD2d 136 [2003]). Accordingly, defendant's failure to make a prima facie showing required the denial of its motion, regardless of the claimed insufficiency of plaintiff's opposition (see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 853 [1985]). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Nardelli, DeGrasse and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.