Combier v City of New York
Annotate this CaseBetsy Combier, Appellant,
v
City of New York et al., Respondents.
—[*1] Betsy Combier, appellant pro se.
Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Karen M. Griffin of counsel), for respondents.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Karen S. Smith, J.), entered October 3, 2007, which denied plaintiff's motion to compel disclosure and granted defendants' cross motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Even were the complaint construed to be a CPLR article 78 petition alleging refusal to furnish requested Parents Association financial records in violation of New York City Department of Education, Chancellor's Regulation A-660, it would have to be dismissed for failure to exhaust the grievance procedures set forth in the pertinent regulation (see Villalba v New York City Dept. of Educ., 50 AD3d 279 [2008]). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Friedman, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.