Juhlin v Dominguez

Juhlin v Dominguez 2008 NY Slip Op 08527 [56 AD3d 286] November 13, 2008 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, January 7, 2009

Bjorn Juhlin, Appellant,
v
Ricardo E. Dominguez et al., Respondents.

—[*1] Pollack, Pollack, Isaac & DeCicco, New York (Brian J. Isaac of counsel), for appellant.

Gallo, Vitucci, Klar, Pinter & Cogan, LLP, New York (Yolanda L. Ayala and Matthew J. Vitucci of counsel), for respondents.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol E. Huff, J.), entered June 6, 2007, which denied plaintiff's motion to set aside the verdict awarding plaintiff, among other things, $70,000 for past pain and suffering and $20,000 for future pain and suffering, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Based on the record before us, the damage awards are not against the weight of the evidence and do not deviate materially from what would be reasonable compensation under the circumstances (see Mejia v JMM Audubon, 1 AD3d 261, 262 [2003]).

We have considered plaintiff's other arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Lippman, P.J., Sweeny, Catterson, Acosta and Renwick, JJ.