Abreu v Quesada

Annotate this Case
Abreu v Quesada 2008 NY Slip Op 08420 [56 AD3d 271] November 6, 2008 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, January 7, 2009

Leticia Abreu, Respondent,
v
Jose A. Quesada, Appellant.

—[*1] Christopher E. Finger, Bronx, for appellant.

Wolf & Wolf, LLP, Bronx (Edward H. Wolf of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alan Saks, J.), entered May 10, 2007, which granted plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability for legal malpractice, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The record contains no dispute that defendant failed to file a proper request for a hearing pursuant to Education Law § 3020-a (2) (c) and that this failure resulted in the loss to plaintiff of pay and benefits to which she otherwise would have been entitled, pending a hearing, before termination (see Bishop v Maurer, 33 AD3d 497, 498 [2006], affd 9 NY3d 910 [2007]; Education Law § 3020-a [2] [b]). Further, defendant's negligence resulted in plaintiff being obliged to retain other counsel and commence a CPLR article 78 proceeding (see Rosenkrantz v Erdheim, 177 AD2d 389 [1991]).

The partial grant of plaintiff's article 78 petition against the Board of Education does not collaterally estop plaintiff from asserting defendant's legal malpractice (see Weiss v Manfredi, 83 NY2d 974, 976-977 [1994]; Savattere v Subin Assoc., 261 AD2d 236, 236 [1999]). Concur—Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Gonzalez, Catterson and Acosta, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.