Matter of Elijah F.

Annotate this Case
Matter of Elijah F. 2008 NY Slip Op 08409 [56 AD3d 260] November 6, 2008 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, January 7, 2009

In the Matter of Elijah F., a Child Alleged to be Permanently Neglected. Edgar F., Appellant; Catholic Guardian Society and Home Bureau, Respondent, et al., Respondent.

—[*1] Steven N. Feinman, White Plains, for appellant.

Magovern & Sclafani, New York (Marion C. Perry of counsel), for Catholic Guardian Society and Home Bureau, respondent.

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Douglas E. Hoffman, J.), entered on or about May 30, 2006, which, insofar as appealed from, upon a fact-finding determination of permanent neglect made at inquest upon respondent father's default, terminated the father's parental rights to the subject child and committed custody and guardianship of the child to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

A preponderance of the evidence demonstrated that termination of the father's parental rights was in the child's best interests. The child is doing well in his preadoptive home, where he has lived virtually his entire life and his foster parents tend to his many special needs and wish to adopt him (see Matter of Taaliyah Simone S.D., 28 AD3d 371 [2006]). Contrary to the father's contention, the circumstances presented do not warrant a suspended judgment. Although he has obtained employment and taken steps to address his drug problem, the record shows that the father will not be able to assume responsibility for the child in the near future, particularly where he fails to fully understand the child's special needs or possess the ability to address them (see [*2]Matter of Michael B., 80 NY2d 299, 311 [1992]; Matter of Jazminn O'Dell P., 39 AD3d 235 [2007]). Concur—Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Gonzalez, Catterson and Acosta, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.