Gonzalez v Société Générale

Annotate this Case
Gonzalez v Soci|fet|fe G|fen|ferale 2008 NY Slip Op 03400 [50 AD3d 477] April 17, 2008 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, June 18, 2008

Armando Gonzalez, as Auxiliary Executor of Antonio Laurentino Turbel, Deceased, et al., Appellants,
v
Société Générale, Respondent.

—[*1] Bolatti & Griffith, LLP, New York (Edward Griffith of counsel), for appellants.

Friend & Reiskind, New York (Edwin M. Reiskind, Jr., of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles E. Ramos, J.), entered September 14, 2007, which denied plaintiffs' motion for disclosure sanctions resolving certain issues and for leave to amend the complaint, and order, same court and Justice, entered November 30, 2007, which granted defendant's motion to strike plaintiffs' notice of deposition, unanimously affirmed, with one bill of costs.

At the least, it appears that defendant, a New York bank, had a good faith belief that it was not legally obligated to produce documents solely in the possession of an Argentine affiliate that had been dismissed from the action years earlier (see 276 AD2d 446 [2000]), a belief eventually confirmed by the motion court's ruling that such production could not be compelled (see 37 AD3d 187 [2007]). Therefore, it cannot be said that any noncompliance by defendant with prior disclosure orders pertaining to such production was so willful as to justify the extreme sanction of precluding it from contesting potentially dispositive issues at trial. Nor should plaintiffs be given leave to amend their complaint nearly five years after they filed a note of issue, especially in view of the proposed new allegations concerning the actions and intentions of a plaintiff long [*2]deceased, or the opportunity on the eve of trial to depose a witness without any persuasive explanation why that deposition could not have been conducted earlier. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Buckley, Catterson and Acosta, JJ. [See 2007 NY Slip Op 32878(U).]

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.