People v Reyes

Annotate this Case
People v Reyes 2008 NY Slip Op 01383 [48 AD3d 267] February 14, 2008 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, April 16, 2008

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Basilio Montezuma Reyes, Appellant.

—[*1] Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York City (Arthur H. Hopkirk of counsel), for appellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (Lucy Jane Lang of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ruth Pickholz, J.), entered on or about May 25, 2006, which adjudicated defendant a level three sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly assessed 30 points under the risk factor for prior crimes based on defendant's conviction of second-degree burglary, which is a "violent felony" under Penal Law § 70.02 (1) (b), and is therefore a "violent felony" under the guidelines of the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders (People v Wroten, 286 AD2d 189, 197-199 [2001], lv denied 97 NY2d 610 [2002]). The guidelines' use of the Penal Law definition is consistent with the intent of the underlying statute (Correction Law § 168-l [5] [b] [ii], [iii]), which does not suggest in any manner that only those prior crimes that involve actual violence should be considered.

The court also properly assessed 15 points under the risk factor for drug or alcohol abuse, based on defendant's admissions to drug abuse (see People v Roland, 292 AD2d 271 [2002], lv denied 98 NY2d 614 [2002]). Contrary to defendant's argument, the applicable guideline requires a history of substance abuse, and not necessarily a drug-related conviction. We have considered and rejected defendant's remaining arguments concerning the court's assessment under this risk factor. [*2]

Defendant did not establish any special circumstances warranting a downward departure from his presumptive risk level (see People v Guaman, 8 AD3d 545 [2004]). Concur—Lippman, P.J., Tom, Buckley and Gonzalez, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.