People v Baez

Annotate this Case
People v Baez 2008 NY Slip Op 00417 [47 AD3d 516] January 24, 2008 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, March 12, 2008

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
David Baez, Appellant.

—[*1] Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York City (Svetlana M. Kornfeind of counsel), for appellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (Daniela Krinshpun of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Arlene R. Silverman, J.), rendered on or about April 20, 2005, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of seven years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant's argument that the evidence was legally insufficient to support his conviction is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we also reject it on the merits. We further find that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490 [1987]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury's determinations concerning identification and credibility, including its evaluation of the victim's opportunity to observe defendant. Concur—Tom, J.P., Saxe, Friedman and Buckley, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.