Elite 29 Realty LLC v Pitt

Annotate this Case
Elite 29 Realty LLC v Pitt 2007 NY Slip Op 09707 [46 AD3d 308] December 11, 2007 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, February 13, 2008

Elite 29 Realty LLC, Respondent,
v
George Pitt et al., Defendants, and Lopez Knudsen Inc. et al., Appellants.

—[*1] Peluso & Touger, LLP, New York City (Carl T. Peluso of counsel), for appellants.

Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, New York City (Philip A. Nemecek of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Thomas A. Stander, J.), entered February 20, 2007, which denied the motion of the Lopez Knudsen defendants-appellants to vacate a prior stipulation of settlement, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

This is the second time these defendants have sought review by this Court of their effort to vacate a settlement agreement they had entered into in open court, after extensive negotiations. We have already considered their arguments and rejected them (39 AD3d 264 [2007]). Concur—Marlow, J.P., Nardelli, Williams and McGuire, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.