People v McCoy

Annotate this Case
People v McCoy 2007 NY Slip Op 08867 [45 AD3d 395] November 15, 2007 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, January 16, 2008

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Kemp McCoy, Appellant.

—[*1] Richard M. Greenberg, Office of the Appellate Defender, New York City (Gian S. King of counsel), for appellant.

Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, Bronx (Jacob Kaplan of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Peter J. Benitez, J.), rendered August 4, 2004, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), and criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to three concurrent terms of 8 to 16 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court's Sandoval ruling balanced the appropriate factors and was a proper exercise of discretion (see People v Hayes, 97 NY2d 203 [2002]). The underlying facts of defendant's prior convictions were relevant to his credibility since they tended to show that he placed his own interests above those of society. Moreover, the court carefully limited these inquiries by precluding reference to particularly inflammatory facts.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Marlow, Williams, Buckley and Malone, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.