People ex rel. Goldberg v Warden, Rikers Is. Correctional Facility

Annotate this Case
People ex rel. Goldberg v Warden of Rikers Is. Correctional Facility 2007 NY Slip Op 08756 [45 AD3d 356] November 13, 2007 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, January 16, 2008

The People of the State of New York ex rel. Harry Goldberg, Appellant,
v
Warden of Rikers Island Correctional Facility, Respondent.

—[*1] Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York City (Jonathan Garelick of counsel), for appellant.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, New York City (Justin R. Long of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Thomas Farber, J.), entered February 10, 2006, which denied petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus and dismissed the proceeding, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

As petitioner is no longer in the custody of respondent Warden and could not be immediately released, the remedy of habeas corpus is unavailable (see People ex rel. Brown v New York State Div. of Parole, 70 NY2d 391, 398 [1987]). Nevertheless, this proceeding is not moot because, inter alia, it affects parole time credited to petitioner. Therefore, we consider the matter as a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (see CPLR 103 [c]).

The petition was properly denied on the ground that the preliminary parole revocation hearing was timely scheduled for November 28, 2005, and was adjourned for the legitimate reason that petitioner was confined for medical reasons (see People ex rel. Moore v Warden of Rikers Is. Correctional Facility, 36 AD3d 494 [2007]). Respondent Division of Parole also acted "energetically and scrupulously" in rescheduling the hearing for December 5, 2005, when it learned of petitioner's release from that confinement (see People ex rel. Burley v Warden, N.Y. City House of Detention at Riker's Is., 70 AD2d 518, 519 [1979], lv denied 48 NY2d 602 [1979]), and petitioner has not cited any prejudice from the short delay. Concur—Tom, J.P., Friedman, Gonzalez, Sweeny and Kavanagh, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.