J & S Constr. of NY, Inc. v 321 Bowery LLC

Annotate this Case
J & S Constr. of NY, Inc. v 321 Bowery LLC 2007 NY Slip Op 03565 [39 AD3d 391] April 24, 2007 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, June 6, 2007

J & S Construction of NY, Inc., Respondent,
v
321 Bowery LLC et al., Defendants, and Commercial Facades, Inc., et al., Appellants. (And a Third-Party Action.)

—[*1] Peter B. Gierer, Hauppauge, for appellants.

Danzig Fishman & Decea, White Plains (Thomas B. Decea of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marylin G. Diamond, J.), entered February 14, 2006, which denied the motion of defendants Commercial Facades, also known as Commercial Facade Incorporated, and Miller Construction Co., Inc. to vacate an order of default, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Appellants claim, as a reasonable excuse for their nonappearance, that they never received any copy of the process in the action because their address on file with the Secretary of State was obsolete. However, the failure to file a change of address with the Secretary of State generally is not a reasonable excuse under CPLR 5015 (a) (1) (Crespo v A.D.A. Mgt., 292 AD2d 5 [2002]). While such a failure does not constitute a per se barrier to vacatur, and some flexibility may be allowed by the courts (Eugene Di Lorenzo, Inc. v A.C. Dutton Lbr. Co., 67 NY2d 138, 143 [1986]), here flexibility is not warranted. At least three years passed during which the appellants' address on file with the Secretary of State was not updated, and appellants' principal, [*2]while denying that he had received the default order, acknowledged that it had been mailed to his home address (see KPG Inc. v Salinas Group Ltd., 11 AD3d 338 [2004]). Concur—Andrias, J.P., Marlow, Sullivan, Gonzalez and Kavanagh, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.