Glascow v Costco Wholesale Corp.

Annotate this Case
Glascow v Costco Wholesale Corp. 2007 NY Slip Op 03198 [39 AD3d 344] April 17, 2007 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, June 6, 2007

Sandria Glascow et al., Respondents,
v
Costco Wholesale Corporation, Appellant.

—[*1] Thomas M. Bona, P.C., White Plains (James C. Miller of counsel), for appellant.

Wallace & Associates, P.C., New York (Larry Wallace of counsel), for respondents.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Edgar G. Walker, J.), entered on or about May 9, 2006, which denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant's moving papers failed to establish as a matter of law that the water depicted in the photograph, showing track marks, had not been on the floor of its premises for a sufficient length of time for its employees to have discovered and remedied it (see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 853 [1985]; Gordon v American Museum of Natural History, 67 NY2d 836, 837 [1986]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Friedman, Williams and Sweeny, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.