People v Ferrer

Annotate this Case
People v Ferrer 2006 NY Slip Op 09717 [35 AD3d 297] December 21, 2006 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, February 14, 2007

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Jose Ferrer, Appellant.

—[*1]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Megan Tallmer, J.), entered on or about May 19, 2005, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the brief, adjudicated defendant a level three sex offender under the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The hearing court properly determined that the risk assessment instrument failed to adequately take into account the paternal relationship between defendant and the victim, that the victim was helpless when left home alone with defendant, and that defendant threatened the victim with the use of a gun. These aggravating factors were not duplicative of the factors relied upon in the risk assessment instrument and guidelines, and they supported the discretionary upward departure by the court to a level three adjudication (see People v Joslyn, 27 AD3d 1033 [2006]; People v O'Flaherty, 23 AD3d 237 [2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 705 [2006]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Marlow, Williams, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.