People v Murray

Annotate this Case
People v Murray 2006 NY Slip Op 09295 [35 AD3d 225] December 12, 2006 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, February 14, 2007

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Cheryse Murray, Appellant.

—[*1]

Judgments, Supreme Court, New York County (Ronald A. Zweibel, J.), rendered December 10, 2004, convicting defendant, upon her pleas of guilty, of attempted burglary in the first degree and burglary in the second degree, and sentencing her, as a persistent violent felony offender, to concurrent terms of 16 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant made a valid waiver of her right to appeal (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248 [2006]). At the plea proceeding, both before and during the actual colloquy between defendant and the court, defendant was thoroughly advised that waiver of the right to appeal from the court's suppression ruling was a requirement of her plea bargain. Defendant expressly and separately waived her right to appeal from that ruling, and the court did not conflate the right to appeal with the rights automatically forfeited by pleading guilty. In any event, were we to find that defendant did not make a valid waiver of her right to appeal, we would find her suppression claim to be without merit. Concur—Saxe, J.P., Sullivan, Williams, Sweeny and Malone, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.