Matter of Octavia Lorraine O. (Wesley C.O.)

Annotate this Case
Matter of Octavia Lorraine O. 2006 NY Slip Op 08060 [34 AD3d 258] November 9, 2006 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, January 17, 2007

In the Matter of Octavia Lorraine O., a Child Alleged to be Permanently Neglected. Wesley C.O., Appellant; Leake and Watts Services, Inc., Respondent.

—[*1]

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Sidney Gribetz, J.), entered on or about July 26, 2004, which, to the extent appealed from, upon a finding of permanent neglect, terminated respondent father's parental rights to the subject child, and transferred custody and guardianship of the child to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York for purposes of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The agency established by clear and convincing evidence that, despite its diligent efforts to strengthen the parental relationship, respondent father permanently neglected his daughter by failing to plan for her future or consistently maintain contact with her (see Social Services Law § 384-b [7] [a]; Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 NY2d 136, 142-143 [1984]; Matter of Orlando F., 40 NY2d 103, 110 [1976]). While the agency attempted to assist respondent father to improve his deficient parenting skills and to remediate his propensity for domestic violence, respondent did not complete a parenting skills course or visit with the child consistently, and his aggressive and threatening behavior continued unabated, as did his lack of insight respecting his role in precipitating the child's placement in foster care (Dutchess County Dept. of Social Servs. v G., 141 Misc 2d 641 [1988], affd 169 AD2d 769 [2d Dept 1991]).

A preponderance of the evidence supported Family Court's determination that it was in the child's best interests (see Family Ct Act § 631; Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 NY2d at 147-[*2]148) to terminate respondent's parental rights to enable the foster mother to adopt her after having cared for her in her home, and bonding with her, over the previous four years. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Marlow, Nardelli and Sweeny, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.