Matter of Fuchs-Matta v Pace Auto Parts Inc.

Annotate this Case
Matter of Fuchs-Matta v Pace Auto Parts, Inc. 2006 NY Slip Op 07982 [34 AD3d 229] November 2, 2006 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, January 17, 2007

In the Matter of Robin Fuchs-Matta, Appellant,
v
Pace Auto Parts, Inc., et al., Respondents.

—[*1]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Sheila Abdus-Salaam, J.), entered October 19, 2005, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding brought pursuant to Business Corporation Law § 624 to compel production of corporate documents, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The record supports the court's determination that respondents have produced all of the corporate books and records in their possession, and a fact-finding hearing was not warranted (see Business Corporation Law § 624 [d]; Matter of Lewis v J & K Plumbing & Heating Co., 71 AD2d 708 [1979]; Matter of S. & S. Realty Corp. v Kleer-Vu Indus., 53 AD2d 552 [1976]; Matter of Botwin v Central Structural Steel Co., 28 AD2d 522 [1967]). The record establishes that the computer sought by petitioner was transferred as part of the sale of the corporation, a sale to which petitioner consented and executed a bill of sale. Petitioner's allegations that respondent Matta withheld some of the records of the corporation are without evidentiary support. Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Sweeny and Malone, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.