Matter of Dexter Washington v Jonathan Lippman

Annotate this Case
Matter of Washington v Lippman 2006 NY Slip Op 05104 [30 AD3d 299] June 22, 2006 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, August 23, 2006

In the Matter of Dexter Washington, Appellant,
v
Jonathan Lippman, as Chief Administrative Judge of the Courts, et al., Respondents.

—[*1]Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Ronald A. Zweibel, J.), entered November 15, 2005, denying the application in the nature of mandamus to compel respondents to vacate a corrected sentence and commitment record which reflected that petitioner had been sentenced as a second violent felony offender, and to immediately release him from custody, and dismissing the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly held that petitioner's claims are barred by collateral estoppel, as they are the same claims that petitioner unsuccessfully litigated in a habeas corpus proceeding in Cayuga County (see Parker v Blauvelt Volunteer Fire Co., 93 NY2d 343, 349 [1999]). The court also properly held that petitioner failed to join necessary parties (see CPLR 1001 [a]; Matter of Lodge v D'Aliso, 2 AD3d 525 [2003], lv denied 2 NY3d 702 [2004]). In any event, all of petitioner's underlying claims are without merit. Concur—Saxe, J.P., Marlow, Nardelli, Catterson and McGuire, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.