All the Way East Fourth St. Block Association v Ryan-NENA Community Health Center

Annotate this Case
All the Way E. Fourth St. Block Assn. v Ryan-NENA Community Health Ctr. 2006 NY Slip Op 04503 [30 AD3d 182] June 8, 2006 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, August 23, 2006

All the Way East Fourth St. Block Association et al., Appellants,
v
Ryan-NENA Community Health Center et al., Respondents.

—[*1]

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Walter B. Tolub, J.), entered October 7, 2005, which denied plaintiffs' motion for a declaration that they held absolute title in fee simple to property known as the East Third Street side of the Orchard Alley Community Garden, denied plaintiffs' motion for preliminary and permanent injunctive relief, granted defendants' cross motion to dismiss the complaint and for an order of ejectment, and awarded defendants full and exclusive use and possession of the subject property, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Dismissal of the complaint on the grounds of vague, conclusory and unsubstantiated allegations was warranted (see Gordon v Dino De Laurentiis Corp., 141 AD2d 435 [1988]). "[M]ere occupancy for an extended period of years coupled with open conduct consistent with ownership, but absent an initial claim of right," may not ripen into ownership by adverse possession (see Joseph v Whitcombe, 279 AD2d 122, 124 [2001]). Defendants demonstrated that plaintiffs did not enter into occupancy of the lot under claim of right. Plaintiffs' claim of a prescriptive easement was also properly dismissed. While entry under a claim of right for a prescriptive easement might be presumed, the presumption herein was defeated. The claimed prescriptive right to use the lot as a community garden would constitute a taking inconsistent with an easement (see Di Leo v Pecksto Holding Corp., 304 NY 505, 512 [1952]). [*2]

We have considered plaintiffs' remaining arguments and find them without merit. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Mazzarelli, Saxe, Williams and McGuire, JJ. [See 9 Misc 3d 1122(A), 2005 NY Slip Op 51743(U).]

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.