Janine M. Blough v Penske Truck Leasing Corporation
Annotate this Case
Blough v Penske Truck Leasing Corp.
2006 NY Slip Op 00226 [25 AD3d 1069]
Decided on January 12, 2006
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on January 12, 2006
Saxe, J.P., Friedman, Williams, Catterson, Malone, JJ.
7567
[*1]Janine M. Blough, etc., Plaintiff-Respondent,
v
Penske Truck Leasing Corporation, Defendant-Appellant, The Martin-Brower Company, Defendant. [And Other Actions]
Decided on January 12, 2006
Saxe, J.P., Friedman, Williams, Catterson, Malone, JJ.
7567
[*1]Janine M. Blough, etc., Plaintiff-Respondent,
v
Penske Truck Leasing Corporation, Defendant-Appellant, The Martin-Brower Company, Defendant. [And Other Actions]
Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton A. Tingling, J.), entered August 30, 2005, unanimously withdrawn in accordance with the terms of the stipulation of the parties hereto. No opinion. Order filed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
