People v Anthony Thomas

Annotate this Case
People v Thomas 2006 NY Slip Op 00084 [25 AD3d 346] January 5, 2006 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, March 22, 2006

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Anthony Thomas, Appellant.

—[*1]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (John A.K. Bradley, J.), rendered June 30, 2004, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds and resisting arrest, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate term of 4½ to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

The People made a sufficiently particularized showing of an overriding interest justifying closure of the courtroom during the undercover officer's testimony (see e.g. People v Lopez, 18 AD3d 233 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 807 [2005]). The officer testified that although he was on restricted duty due to an injury, he planned, upon his recovery, to resume undercover work in the specific area of defendant's arrest. He also testified that unapprehended subjects remained at large and that he feared for his safety. Furthermore, the court properly permitted the officer to testify anonymously based on this same showing (see People v Waver, 3 NY3d 748 [2004]). Concur—Buckley, P.J., Friedman, Marlow, Sullivan and Malone, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.