Melvyn Gonzalez v Soo Jong Kim

Annotate this Case
Gonzalez v Soo Jong Kim 2005 NY Slip Op 09626 [24 AD3d 229] December 15, 2005 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, February 15, 2006

Melvyn Gonzalez, Appellant,
v
Soo Jong Kim, Respondent.

—[*1]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Anne E. Targum, J.), entered February 11, 2002, which, after a hearing before a Judicial Hearing Officer, dismissed the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The complaint alleging that plaintiff was fraudulently induced into giving defendant $34,000 on the false assurance that he would become an equal partner in a fruit and vegetable store was properly dismissed. The testimony at the hearing before the Judicial Hearing Officer showed that the money plaintiff provided defendant was an investment in a business that ultimately failed. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Andrias, Catterson and Malone, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.