David Fontanez v St. Barnabas Hospital

Annotate this Case
Fontanez v St. Barnabas Hosp. 2005 NY Slip Op 09456 [24 AD3d 218] December 13, 2005 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, February 15, 2006

David Fontanez, Appellant,
v
St. Barnabas Hospital et al., Respondents. (And a Third-Party Action.)

—[*1]Appeal from order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard Silver, J.), entered June 8, 2005, which denied plaintiff's motion for reargument, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from a nonappealable paper.

The motion court correctly determined that since the issues raised in plaintiff's present motion had been previously litigated and decided, and since plaintiff did not submit any new or additional facts not before the court on the prior occasion, plaintiff's motion, although denominated as one for both reargument and renewal, was, in essence, a motion to reargue. The motion was denied as such, and it is well settled that orders denying reargument are not appealable (see e.g. Rosen v Rosenholc, 303 AD2d 230 [2003]). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Friedman, Sullivan and Williams, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.