Beatrice Weber v City of New York

Annotate this Case
Weber v City of New York 2005 NY Slip Op 09221 [24 AD3d 130] December 6, 2005 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, February 15, 2006

Beatrice Weber, Appellant,
v
City of New York, Defendant, and 303 Park Avenue South Associates, Respondent.

—[*1]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marilyn Shafer, J.), entered on or about June 28, 2004, which, in an action for personal injuries sustained in a trip and fall allegedly caused by a raised metal cover in front of defendant-respondent's premises, denied plaintiff's motion to set aside the verdict as against the weight of the evidence, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The jury's finding that defendant was negligent in not correcting a dangerous condition on a portion of the sidewalk put to its special use is not inconsistent with its finding that such negligence was not a substantial factor in causing plaintiff's trip and fall. Given trial testimony by plaintiff and her main witness that was far from unequivocal and at times even contradictory on the issues of the nature and location of the sidewalk defect over which plaintiff tripped, the jury could well have found that plaintiff failed to meet her burden of proving that the cause of her fall was the negligently maintained raised metal cover in front of defendant's premises (see Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129, 133-134 [1985]). Concur—Buckley, P.J., Andrias, Saxe, Nardelli and Malone, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.