People v Charles Trotter

Annotate this Case
People v Trotter 2005 NY Slip Op 09214 [24 AD3d 127] December 1, 2005 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, February 15, 2006

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Charles Trotter, Appellant.

—[*1]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bruce Allen, J.), rendered May 23, 2003, convicting defendant, after a nonjury trial, of robbery in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 2½ to 5 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the court's determinations concerning credibility (see People v Gaimari, 176 NY 84, 94 [1903]). The court reasonably could have concluded that defendant used force for the purpose of simultaneously retaining the shoplifted property and fleeing from the store (see e.g. People v Onorati, 15 AD3d 216 [2005]). The record fails to support defendant's assertion that the store detective gave contradictory testimony as to the sequence of events. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Friedman, Nardelli, Sweeny and McGuire, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.