People v Corey Smith

Annotate this Case
People v Smith 2005 NY Slip Op 08861 [23 AD3d 280] November 22, 2005 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, January 18, 2006

The People of the State of New York, Appellant,
v
Corey Smith, Respondent.

—[*1]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ruth Pickholz, J.), rendered February 1, 2005, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 3½ years, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of vacating the sentence and remanding to Supreme Court for resentencing in accordance with the decision herein, and otherwise affirmed.

Defendant committed this crime before the effective date of the Drug Law Reform Act (L 2004, ch 738) but was sentenced after that date. The sentencing court erred when it invoked the amelioration doctrine of People v Behlog (74 NY2d 237 [1989]) to give defendant the benefit of the reduced penalty contained in the new law. We have concluded that for purposes of the Drug Law Reform Act, the Legislature intended to negate the amelioration doctrine (People v Nelson, 21 AD3d 861 [2005]). Accordingly, we remand for resentencing in accordance with the law applicable at the time of the crime. Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Sullivan, Gonzalez and Malone, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.