Matter of Douglas B. Klunder v Marcy S. Friedman
Annotate this Case
Matter of Klunder v Friedman
2005 NY Slip Op 08015 [22 AD3d 1038]
Decided on October 27, 2005
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on October 27, 2005
Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Friedman, Nardelli, Malone, JJ.
6936
[*1]In re Douglas B. Klunder, Petitioner, Hon.
v
Marcy S. Friedman, etc., et al., Respondents. Jeffrey M. Duban, Bronxville, for petitioner. Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, New York (Monica A. Connell of counsel), for Hon. Marcy S. Friedman, respondent. Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo, P.C., New York (Ellen M. Vuolo of counsel), for Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo and Spa Chakra, LLC, respondents.
Decided on October 27, 2005
Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Friedman, Nardelli, Malone, JJ.
6936
[*1]In re Douglas B. Klunder, Petitioner, Hon.
v
Marcy S. Friedman, etc., et al., Respondents. Jeffrey M. Duban, Bronxville, for petitioner. Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, New York (Monica A. Connell of counsel), for Hon. Marcy S. Friedman, respondent. Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo, P.C., New York (Ellen M. Vuolo of counsel), for Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo and Spa Chakra, LLC, respondents.
Application for an order pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules denied, the cross motions granted and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements. All concur. No opinion. Order filed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
