Solow Management Corp. v Arista Records, Inc.
Annotate this Case
Solow Mgt. Corp. v Arista Records, Inc.
2005 NY Slip Op 04334 [18 AD3d 399]
May 31, 2005
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, July 20, 2005
Solow Management Corp., Appellant,
v
Arista Records, Inc., Respondent.
Solow Management Corp., Appellant,
v
Arista Records, Inc., Respondent.
—[*1]Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter B. Tolub, J.), entered May 3, 2004, which, inter alia, found that certain actions were unrelated, unanimously dismissed as academic, with costs in favor of defendant, payable by plaintiff.
In light of this Court's decision in Solow Mgt. Corp. v Seltzer (18 AD3d — [2005] [decided herewith]), the disputed finding in the presently appealed order is academic. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Marlow, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
