Wilma Clark v Marshall B. Bellovin

Annotate this Case
Clark v Bellovin 2005 NY Slip Op 03777 [18 AD3d 246] May 10, 2005 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, July 20, 2005

Wilma Clark, Appellant,
v
Marshall B. Bellovin, Esq., Respondent.

—[*1]Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Rosalyn Richter, J.), entered February 18, 2004, which denied plaintiff's motion for a default judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant's timely appearance in this legal malpractice action precluded a default judgment (CPLR 3215 [a]). The action was properly dismissed for plaintiff's failure to serve a complaint after a timely demand (CPLR 3012 [b]), and because she has commenced a similar second malpractice action, in the same court, against this defendant and his firm (CPLR 3211 [a] [4]). Concur—Buckley, P.J., Tom, Saxe, Friedman and Marlow, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.