Matter of Mark Tarka v Renee R. Roth
Annotate this Case
Matter of Tarka v Roth
2005 NY Slip Op 03345 [17 AD3d 1174]
Decided on April 28, 2005
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on April 28, 2005
Andrias, J.P., Marlow, Sullivan, Gonzalez, Sweeny, JJ.
6036
[*1]In re Mark Tarka, Petitioner, Hon.
v
Renee R. Roth, etc., et al., Respondents.
Mark Tarka, petitioner pro se.
Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, New York (Katherine E. Timon
of counsel), for Hon. Renee R. Roth, respondent.
Bekerman & Reddy, P.C., New York (Jay H. Ziffer of counsel),
for Ethel J. Griffin, Public Administrator of the County of New
York, respondent.
Melanie Tarka, respondent pro se.
Decided on April 28, 2005
Andrias, J.P., Marlow, Sullivan, Gonzalez, Sweeny, JJ.
6036
[*1]In re Mark Tarka, Petitioner, Hon.
v
Renee R. Roth, etc., et al., Respondents.
Mark Tarka, petitioner pro se.
Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, New York (Katherine E. Timon
of counsel), for Hon. Renee R. Roth, respondent.
Bekerman & Reddy, P.C., New York (Jay H. Ziffer of counsel),
for Ethel J. Griffin, Public Administrator of the County of New
York, respondent.
Melanie Tarka, respondent pro se.
Application for an order pursuant to Article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules denied, the cross motions granted and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements. All concur. No opinion. Order filed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
