Michael Katz v American Mayflower Life Insurance Company of New York
Annotate this Case
Katz v American Mayflower Life Ins. Co. of N. Y.
2004 NY Slip Op 09718
Decided on December 28, 2004
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on December 28, 2004
Buckley, P.J., Tom, Sullivan, Williams, JJ.
3370
[*1]Michael Katz, etc., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v
American Mayflower Life Insurance Company of New York, Defendant-Respondent.
Wechsler Harwood LLP, New York (William R. Weinstein of
counsel), for appellant.
Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal LLP, New York (Reid L.
Ashinoff, and Michael S. Gugig of counsel), for respondent.
Decided on December 28, 2004
Buckley, P.J., Tom, Sullivan, Williams, JJ.
3370
[*1]Michael Katz, etc., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v
American Mayflower Life Insurance Company of New York, Defendant-Respondent.
Wechsler Harwood LLP, New York (William R. Weinstein of
counsel), for appellant.
Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal LLP, New York (Reid L.
Ashinoff, and Michael S. Gugig of counsel), for respondent.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered January 30, 2003, affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Opinion by Sullivan, J. All concur except Tom, J. who dissents in an Opinion.
Order filed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
