Arcenio Sanango v 200 East 16th Street Housing Corporation

Annotate this Case
Sanango v 200 E. 16th St. Hous. Corp. 2004 NY Slip Op 09717 Decided on December 28, 2004 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 28, 2004
Nardelli, J.P., Saxe, Williams, Friedman, JJ.
2571

[*1]Arcenio Sanango, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v

200 East 16th Street Housing Corporation, Defendant-Appellant, Kelleran & Associates, Inc., Defendant. 200 East 16th Street Housing Corporation, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, Tower Building Restoration, Inc., etc., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant, Joseph K. Blum, Co., L.L.P., Third-Party Defendant.




Mauro Goldberg & Lilling LLP, Great Neck (Kenneth Mauro of
counsel), for appellants.
Alexander J. Wulwick, New York, for respondent.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Werner
Kornreich, J.), entered October 17, 2002, modified, on the law,
to vacate the awards for past and future lost earnings, the matter
remanded for a new trial on the issue of past and future lost
earnings measured by the wages prevailing in plaintiff's country
of origin, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
Opinion by Friedman, J. All concur.

Order filed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.