Matter of Mark Ochoa v Hon. Dominic R. Massaro
Annotate this Case
Matter of Ochoa v Massaro
2004 NY Slip Op 09450 [13 AD3d 1234]
Decided on December 21, 2004
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on December 21, 2004
Mazzarelli, J.P., Ellerin, Marlow, Gonzalez, Catterson, JJ.
5101
[*1]In re Mark Ochoa, Petitioner,
v
Hon. Dominic R. Massaro, etc., et al., Respondents.
Mark Ochoa, petitioner pro se.
Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, New York (Charles F. Sanders
of counsel), for Hon. Dominic R. Massaro, respondent.
Decided on December 21, 2004
Mazzarelli, J.P., Ellerin, Marlow, Gonzalez, Catterson, JJ.
5101
[*1]In re Mark Ochoa, Petitioner,
v
Hon. Dominic R. Massaro, etc., et al., Respondents.
Mark Ochoa, petitioner pro se.
Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, New York (Charles F. Sanders
of counsel), for Hon. Dominic R. Massaro, respondent.
Application for an order pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules denied and the petition dismissed,
without costs or disbursements. All concur. No opinion. Order filed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
