Jasminder Sawhney v Walter P. Bailey

Annotate this Case
Sawhney v Bailey 2004 NY Slip Op 09410 [13 AD3d 203] December 21, 2004 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, February 23, 2005

Jasminder Sawhney et al., Respondents,
v
Walter P. Bailey et al., Appellants, and Manvinders Sawhney, Respondent, et al., Defendant.

—[*1]Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Sallie Manzanet, J.), entered on or about July 7, 2003, which denied the motion of defendants Bailey and Lily Transportation for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Although it is well settled that a rear-end collision with a stopped vehicle creates a presumption that the operator of the moving vehicle was negligent (see Agramonte v City of New York, 288 AD2d 75 [2001]), issues may arise as to whether the driver of the forward vehicle stopped or slowed suddenly (see Martin v Pullafico, 272 AD2d 305 [2000]). Since there is conflict as to whether the driver of the truck suddenly slowed as he approached an overpass on a highway on which the truck was not permitted in the first place, the denial of summary judgment was appropriate. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Mazzarelli, Saxe, Ellerin and Gonzalez, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.