Keira M. Broderick v R.Y. Management Co., Inc.

Annotate this Case
Broderick v R.Y. Mgt. Co., Inc. 2004 NY Slip Op 09394 [13 AD3d 197] December 16, 2004 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, February 23, 2005

Keira M. Broderick, an Infant, by Her Mother and Natural Guardian, Edith M. Lee, et al., Respondents,
v
R.Y. Management Co., Inc., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

—[*1]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Stanley Green, J.), entered March 9, 2004, which denied defendants' motion to change the venue of this action from Bronx County to New York County, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

There was insufficient evidence to substantiate defendants' contention that venue had been improperly placed in Bronx County. We note in particular that although William Condren, a general partner in defendant Grote Street Associates, averred that Grote Street's principal and only office was in New York County, there was no documentary evidence offered to confirm that assertion. Indeed, the documentary evidence adduced by plaintiffs, showing that Grote Street Associates maintained offices at two Bronx locations, read together with defendant's disingenuous attempt to explain away the contents of the first Condren affidavit, demonstrates that the IAS court properly denied defendants' motion. Concur—Williams, J.P., Marlow, Gonzalez, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.