People v Wayne Singleton

Annotate this Case
People v Singleton 2004 NY Slip Op 09184 [13 AD3d 116] December 9, 2004 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, February 23, 2005

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Wayne Singleton, Appellant.

—[*1]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Laura A. Ward, J.), rendered April 2, 2003, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him to a term of one year, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly imposed an enhanced sentence after defendant clearly violated various terms of his plea agreement (see People v Outley, 80 NY2d 702 [1993]). Defendant's argument that the sentencing court should have conducted a further inquiry as to whether he had successfully completed a drug treatment program is unpreserved and unavailing (see People v Rhymer, 3 AD3d 315 [2004], lv denied 2 NY3d 745 [2004]). In any event, there is no basis for dismissal of the indictment, the only relief defendant seeks on appeal. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Ellerin, Lerner, Marlow and Catterson, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.