People v Harry Williams

Annotate this Case
People v Williams 2004 NY Slip Op 08998 [13 AD3d 92] December 7, 2004 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, February 23, 2005

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Harry Williams, Appellant.

—[*1]Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bonnie Wittner, J.), rendered February 6, 2003, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second and third degrees, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of eight years and five years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. As we concluded on the codefendant's appeal (People v Martinez, 8 AD3d 8 [2004], lv denied 3 NY3d 677 [2004]), there is no basis for disturbing the jury's determinations concerning credibility. Defendant's acquittal of other charges does not warrant a different conclusion (see People v Rayam, 94 NY2d 557 [2000]).

We decline to invoke our interest of justice jurisdiction to dismiss the noninclusory concurrent count (see People v Spence, 290 AD2d 223 [2002], lv denied 98 NY2d 641 [2002]; People v Kulakov, 278 AD2d 519 [2000], lv denied 96 NY2d 785 [2001]).

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Friedman and Gonzalez, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.